peer_form_create_rating
creates a short feedback form for authors to rate the feedback they got from reviewers. The rating categories are based on Reily, K. and P. Ludford Finnerty, and L. Terveen (2009): Two Peers Are Better Than One: Aggregating Peer Reviews for Computing Assignments is Surprisingly Accurate. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. GROUP’09, May 10–13, 2009, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
peer_form_create_rating( category = c("helpfulness", "accuracy", "fairness"), title = "Author rating form", fname = "feedback_blank_rating", output = "github_document", write_rmd = TRUE, overwrite = FALSE, allow_comment = FALSE )
category | Character. Categories to be included in the feedback form, defaults to |
---|---|
title | Character. Title of form, defaults to "Author rating form". |
fname | Character. File name of RMarkdown document to be written to memory, defaults to |
output | Character. Output parameter for |
write_rmd | Logical. Whether the feedback form should be saved to a |
overwrite | Logical. Should existing file or files with same name be overwritten, defaults to |
allow_comment | Logical. Should optional comment field be included? Defaults to |
Other peer review functions:
peer_assign()
,
peer_file_add_aut()
,
peer_file_add_rev()
,
peer_form_create_review()
,
peer_init()
,
peer_return()
,
peer_roster_create()
,
peer_score_rating()
,
peer_score_review()